Washington lawmakers take action to protect the environment
House passes legislation to care for
everything
from state’s infants to waterways
March 5, 2009
OLYMPIA – The Washington State House of Representatives on Wednesday
tackled a package of environmental-related legislation, passing bills that
will do everything from shielding infants from harmful chemicals to
protecting our state’s water supply from pollution.
“With all the
talk surrounding the economy, it’s easy to forget about our state’s other
priorities,” said Rep. Mary Lou Dickerson (D-Seattle). “The environment
affects every aspect of our lives and today we took steps to protect it.”
Headlining the day’s bills was Dickerson’s House Bill 1180, which aims
to reduce children’s exposure to bisphenol A (BPA) by eliminating it from
products they eat and drink out of every day such as baby bottles and sippy
cups.
BPA is a hormone-disrupting chemical that can have health
effects at extremely low exposure levels. Laboratory studies have linked BPA
to cancer, miscarriages, obesity, reproductive problems and hyperactivity.
“BPA is a dangerous chemical that should never get anywhere near a baby
or young child’s lips,” Dickerson said. “Imagine giving a baby a bottle
laced with a cancer-causing chemical.”
A rally was held Wednesday on
the steps of the Legislative Building on the Capitol campus in favor of
passing Dickerson’s bill.
Also making its way through the House on
Wednesday was House Bill 2116, which allows for the Department of Ecology to
award federal stimulus funds to local governments for water-quality
improvement projects.
Rep. Marcie Maxwell’s bill allows the
Department of Ecology to grant federal stimulus funds to local governments
for water-quality improvement projects. Since 1987, the federal State Clean
Water Revolving Fund has provided low-interest loans to help local
governments, utility districts and their ratepayers complete high-priority
water quality projects that they may not be able to afford otherwise. These
projects include wastewater treatment plants, main sewers, storm water
control and more. In Washington, the fund is administered by the Department
of Ecology. Maxwell’s bill would make the Department of Ecology’s rules line
up with the federal stimulus criteria, so that it can allocate the state’s
incoming $65 million for the SRF program.
“This bill opens the door
to our state receiving millions of dollars of federal stimulus funds so
local governments can break ground on water-quality projects, creating jobs
and economic activity,” Maxwell said.
Other environmental measures
making it through the House on Wednesday include:
• Rep. Fred Finn’s
HB 1997 aims to create research programs and projects to restore the health
and well-being of Puget Sound. Finn’s plan limits expenditures from the
Puget Sound Scientific Research Account to research programs and projects
selected by the Puget Sound Science Panel.
• Rep. John McCoy’s HB
1135 promotes the use of alternative energy by streamlining the permitting
process for anaerobic digesters, exempting them from the otherwise required
solid waste handling permit. This bill makes it easier for us to use
anaerobic digestion, which produces heat and electricity, by cutting out
extra steps in the process.
• Rep. Kevin Van De Wege’s HB 1484
expands the riparian open space program to include the acquisition of forest
lands containing critical habitat for threatened or endangered species.
• Rep. Dan Newhouse’s HB 1864, with bi-partisan support from Rep. Sam
Hunt, exempts a component city or town with a population of 1,000 or fewer
located
within an Indian reservation from paying a local air pollution
control authority.